What is the difference between "marker.setVisible(false)" and "marker.setMap(null)" in Google Maps v3?

I want to clear a marker on Google Maps.

What is the difference between marker.setVisible(false) and marker.setMap(null)?

But I don't know, which is right?

Answers


The difference between the two methods does not seem to be clearly documented. However, note the following:

  • When you use setMap(null), your marker will lose the reference to the Map. If you do not keep a reference to the Map object, you wouldn't be able to reshow the marker.

  • In addition, the setMap() method will not trigger the visible_changed event, while the setVisible() method does (if the visibility is actually toggled).

Example:

var map = new google.maps.Map(document.getElementById('map'), {
  zoom: 4,
  center: new google.maps.LatLng(-25.363, 131.044),
  mapTypeId: google.maps.MapTypeId.ROADMAP
});

var marker = new google.maps.Marker({
  position: new google.maps.LatLng(-25.363, 131.044), 
  map: map
}); 

google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'visible_changed', function() {
  console.log('visible_changed triggered');
});

marker.setVisible(false); // visible_changed triggered
marker.setVisible(true);  // visible_changed triggered
marker.setMap(null);      // visible_changed not triggered
marker.setMap(map);       // visible_changed not triggered

I guess we should be using the setVisible(false) method when we intend to reshow the marker again on the map, and the setMap(null) when we will not be showing it again.


Another key distinction is that setMap(NULL) releases the resources associated with the marker whereas setVisible(false) just makes the marker invisible, but the resources associated with the marker are still allocated.

If you're dealing with 100s or 1000s of markers, this can become a significant performance and memory issue.


Need Your Help

strpos() with multiple needles?

php full-text-search full-text-indexing strpos

I am looking for a function like strpos() with two significant differences:

Performance of using static methods vs instantiating the class containing the methods

performance oop static methods instance

I'm working on a project in C#. The previous programmer didn't know object oriented programming, so most of the code is in huge files (we're talking around 4-5000 lines) spread over tens and someti...